ISO 22333 Revision CheckerISO/DIS 22333
Draft stage
40.60, close of voting
Voting closed
20 June 2026
Publication estimate
16 September 2027, an estimate
Certificate basis
ISO 22301:2019, unchanged

Stage 40.60, voting closed 20 June 2026. Publication estimate 16 September 2027, an estimate. Certificate basis ISO 22301:2019, unchanged.

01Position02Processes03Impact and risk04Strategies05Plans06Exercises07Evaluation08Audit and improvement
4.2 requirement Context of the organization

Needs and expectations of interested parties

Keep a register of who has a stake in continuity and what each of them actually requires, including the legal and regulatory obligations that attach to keeping services running.

01What applies

Establish who holds a stake in the organization's continuity and what each party requires of it. Cover stated expectations and the legal and regulatory obligations tied to keeping products and services going. The clause makes a distinction the register must keep: an expectation is not an obligation, and an obligation is not automatically a continuity requirement until it is read against what the organization does. The register is maintained, not produced once. A party with no requirement recorded against it is a name, not an interested party.

02Why it matters

Most continuity failures are discovered by a party the organization forgot to ask. A customer with a contractual recovery time, a regulator with a notification window, an insurer with a condition, an emergency service that expects a named contact: each changes what the BCMS has to deliver. The clause turns those into explicit requirements so the impact analysis and the plans can be tested against them. It also stops the legal register from sitting with the legal team, disconnected from the continuity work.

03What good looks like

Build the register in three columns: party, requirement, and the clause or contract that creates it. Split legal obligations into those that constrain continuity directly (notification, service levels, safety) and those that only shape the record. Give each requirement an owner and a review date. Ask customers for the continuity clause in their contract, not for their opinion.

04Evidence an auditor asks for

Pick two customers at random and ask for the continuity requirement in their contract. If it is not in the register, the register is incomplete.

EvidenceThe record
Interested party registerRegister with a requirement recorded against every party, each with its source
Legal registerApplicable continuity-related legal and regulatory obligations, mapped to the activity they constrain
Maintenance recordEvidence both registers are reviewed, not one-time artefacts

05Where it commonly fails

  • Stakeholder list with no requirement recorded against any entry
  • Legal obligations left with the legal team and never connected to continuity planning
  • Customers under contractual continuity terms, or emergency services, missing from the register

06What to do before the estimate

Pull the continuity and service credit clauses from the top ten customer contracts. Add one row per clause to the register, with the contract reference.

07Read across

Full register / The dates / Free check